How it's built
Architecture, source, services, infrastructure, dependencies and trust boundaries.
PLATFORM
An exploitable path rarely lives in one scanner. 0day Factory reasons across software, infrastructure, identity, security controls, organizational constraints and runtime behavior to discover and prove exploitable attack paths — then re-tests the fix.
0day Factory investigates the relationships between the layers attackers actually chain — not one surface at a time.
FED BY: ORG RESTRICTIONS · SECURITY DNA · PRIOR FINDINGS · THREAT MODELS · EXCEPTIONS
Better models make hypotheses cheap. They do not know your architecture, identity relationships, controls, standards, exceptions, tenant boundaries or remediation history. That context is the moat.
Architecture, source, services, infrastructure, dependencies and trust boundaries.
Security controls, SDLC rules, internal standards, threat models and approved exceptions.
Runtime behavior, reachable paths, exploit evidence, past findings and remediation outcomes.
Can this path actually be exploited here? Every finding answers attacker outcome, exact path, controls crossed or missing, the failed assumption, the proof, the engineering fix, and the re-test result.
Customer-controlled workers execute explicitly scoped tasks near approved targets. The control plane manages authorization, task boundaries, evidence and auditability: 0DF CONTROL PLANE → SCOPED TASK → CUSTOMER WORKER → APPROVED TARGET.
Scope, identity, TTL, network boundary, approval mode and evidence retention are all explicit. This capability is in Private Preview — it is labeled as such until it is production-ready.
Targets come from the engagement record; out-of-scope targets are refused.
Separate agent identities, short-lived scoped credentials, non-admin roles.
Prohibited actions, data-access limits and approval boundaries are honored.
Every action is recorded — the engagement's evidence of authorization.
Approval gates where you want them; cancel at any time.
Database row-level isolation keeps each tenant's work separate.
The category label fits, but the emphasis is different: full-system context and defensible exploit proof, not another alert generator. Penetration testing is a use case, not the identity of the product.
The product surface — multi-tenant workspaces, findings, triage, evidence and coordinated-disclosure export — is Available. Customer-controlled execution is in Private Preview. Capabilities are labeled Available, Private Preview or Planned; nothing is implied production-ready before it is.
Request access and see a de-identified investigation: hypothesis, path, safe validation, evidence and re-test.